My NRA blood transfused brother sent me this email:
This should be published nationwide
Great quote. Too bad we don't know who wrote it....
"The danger to America is not Barack Obama but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the presidency. It will be easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to an electorate willing to have such a man for their president. The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere symptom of what ails us. Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince. The republic can survive a Barack Obama. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools such as those who made him their president.”
-- Author Unknown
I always find these things interesting to research. A quick search is done by just copying any part of the rant and pasting it into a google search bar. Most times you'll quickly see where the post came from, how it was changed over time to suit the current GOP rant and often how it's original innocent beginnings were twisted. I copied the last line of this one and got thousands of web pages with this exact wording. Most of the hits were just this passage tagged onto some other persons page. This tagging included the NY times! What makes this rant unique is it's purity. It was copied and pasted so many times, that I was on search page 12 before I gave up. The speed with which they can circulate their propaganda is impressive and worthy of applause. They are distribution masters.
One has to wonder if this is done with a purpose? Is the idea gently pushed out into the internet stream and then watched to see if anyone picks up on it? Or is there an organized group that posts these malevolent thoughts everywhere and anywhere they find a spot to post it? Thus explaining the surprising purity of this one. It is human nature to change things to support our arguments and it can be seen in internet posts everywhere. They change with each telling like the old telephone game we played in our youth. You know, the one were you whispered a passage to the person next to you and they whispered it to the next person, and so on until the garbled product finally got back to you. But this passage has not changed, not in 12 search pages of internet sites thus indicating it is being mechanically reproduced. If not by a machine, by humans quickly copy and pasting it to as many sites as they can.
We are all slaves to our computers and anyone who can manipulate the blog process owns us.
But now a few thoughts on the content. Just what does "anonymous" mean by ".....capable of entrusting a man like him..." Do they mean a black man? A tall man? I'd like to think they mean because he smokes because that is probably the only truly nasty thing he does of which we are all aware. What has he done to warrant this kind of a smear campaign? Has he invaded an innocent country? Has he ruined the world economy? has he stopped the distribution of condoms to HIV infected people? There is nothing in this passage that says he has done anything wrong.
It is just Obama's mere existence that is distasteful to the author. No wonder he is anonymous.